The DCI has denied claims that it has been spying on Kenyans’ mobile phones and other digital devices. The allegations, which were published in the Daily Nation, accused the DCI of installing spy software on activist Bryan Adagala’s devices to monitor his communications.
DCI Dismisses Surveillance Claims
In a statement on Friday, the DCI labelled the claims as “false and sensational”. The agency said it cannot provide more information at this time as it is an ongoing court matter. Despite the media reports, the DCI assured the public that it operates within the law and will never breach individuals’ privacy.
“The Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) wishes to address the misleading claims published in today’s Daily Nation regarding alleged surveillance of mobile phones and other digital devices by the DCI,” the statement read. “We refute these claims as false and sensational, meant to mislead the public and undermine the DCI.”
DCI’s Commitment to Kenyans’ Rights
The DCI also told the public that it takes its responsibility seriously and operates within legal boundaries. The statement further reiterated their commitment to protecting all Kenyans’ rights and privacy and that no activities are done that compromise constitutional principles.
“We want to assure the members of the public that the DCI operates strictly within the law. Our commitment to upholding the rights and privacy of all Kenyans is unwavering and we do not engage in any activities that compromise these constitutional principles,” the DCI added.
A Closer Look
The claims about the DCI’s alleged surveillance were published in an article in Daily Nation which said the agency used advanced spy software to track activist Bryan Adagala’s digital activities. The article has raised concerns about privacy and government institutions overreach in monitoring citizens.
What’s Next?
As the story continues to unfold, the DCI is not providing more details. The matter is now a court case, so we may get more information once the case is concluded. For now, the public is left with the DCI’s assurance that it operates within Kenyan law.
Public Opinion
While the DCI has denied the claims, the public is divided. Some are concerned about privacy while others believe the DCI is following procedure. We will see what the court case will reveal.